Which AI Model Should I Use with Shakespeare?
Choosing the right AI model can transform your development experience in Shakespeare. With access to 40+ models across multiple providers, you have the flexibility to match the perfect AI to your project type.
Choosing the right AI model can transform your development experience in Shakespeare. With access to 40+ models across multiple providers, you have the flexibility to match the perfect AI to your project type. This guide compares different AI models available in Shakespeare and shows you which ones work best for everything from simple landing pages to complex applications.
Our Top Recommendations
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 - The Professional's Choice
When to use: Complex websites, professional projects, advanced functionality
At the time of writing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 represents the gold standard for AI-powered website building. Here's why it excels:
Strengths:
- • Exceptional understanding of modern web development
- • Superior code quality with clean, semantic HTML/CSS
- • Advanced reasoning for complex layout challenges
- • Excellent at responsive design implementation
- • Outstanding documentation and code comments
Best for:
- • Business websites requiring pixel-perfect design
- • Complex e-commerce platforms
- • Sites with advanced interactive features
- • Professional portfolios and corporate websites
- • Projects where code quality is paramount
Cost consideration: Premium pricing, but worth it for high-stakes projects
Z.ai GLM 4.5 - The Smart Budget Choice
When to use: Most website building tasks, cost-conscious projects
Here's the game-changer: Z.ai GLM 4.5 delivers near Claude level performance at a fraction of the cost. Our extensive testing shows it nearly matches Claude's capabilities in most website building scenarios.
Strengths:
- • Similar output quality to Claude for standard websites
- • Excellent at modern CSS frameworks and responsive design
- • Strong understanding of accessibility best practices
- • Reliable performance across different project types
- • Significantly lower costs than premium alternatives
Best for:
- • Personal websites and portfolios
- • Small business websites
- • Landing pages and marketing sites
- • Prototyping and experimentation
- • High-volume projects where cost matters
Cost advantage: Often 60-80% less expensive than Claude with comparable results
When to Choose Other Models
🌐 OpenRouter - The All-in-One Solution
Best for: Users who want access to multiple models without multiple subscriptions
OpenRouter is a game-changer for flexibility:
- • Access Claude, GPT-5, Gemini, and 40+ other models with a single API key
- • No need for multiple AI provider subscriptions
- • Easy switching between models to find what works best
- • Pay only for what you use across all providers
- • Perfect for comparing models side-by-side
🤖 OpenAI GPT Models - The Versatile Option
Best for: Content-heavy sites, creative projects, rapid prototyping
GPT models excel when your website needs:
- • Rich, engaging content generation
- • Creative design ideas and variations
- • Quick iteration and experimentation
- • Integration with existing OpenAI workflows
💻 Local Models (via Ollama) - The Privacy Champion
Best for: Sensitive projects, offline development, learning
Choose local models when you need:
- • Complete privacy and data control
- • Offline development capabilities
- • No usage costs after initial setup
- • Full customization of model behavior
Popular local models:
- • GPT-OSS - OpenAI's open-weight models for reasoning and agentic tasks
- • DeepSeek-R1 - Performance approaching O3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro
- • Gemma 3 - Google's most capable single-GPU model
Choosing Based on Project Type
Simple Landing Pages
Recommended: GLM 4.5
- • Cost-effective for straightforward layouts
- • Excellent CSS and responsive design
- • Fast iteration and deployment
Professional Websites
Recommended: Claude Sonnet 4.5
- • Professional code quality
- • Advanced SEO optimization
- • Complex functionality handling
- • Brand consistency maintenance
E-commerce Sites
Recommended: Claude Sonnet 4.5
- • Complex state management
- • Payment integration expertise
- • Security best practices
- • Performance optimization
Personal Projects & Learning
Recommended: Local models or Z.ai GLM 4.5
- • Free options (local) or low costs (Z.ai)
- • Great for experimentation
- • Learn without budget pressure
Prototypes & MVPs
Recommended: GLM 4.5
- • Rapid development
- • Cost-effective iteration
- • Easy to scale up to premium models later
Cost-Performance Analysis
Choosing the right AI model comes down to matching your budget with your project needs. If you're building something important for your business or clients and money isn't tight, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is worth the extra cost because it consistently produces high-quality, professional websites that work reliably. For small business owners who need professional results but want to watch their spending, Z.ai GLM 4.5 is a game-changer—it creates websites that look and work almost as well as Claude's for much less money. When you're working on personal websites or side projects where budget matters most, you have two great options: local models cost nothing to run once set up (perfect if you're comfortable with some technical setup), or Z.ai GLM 4.5 if you prefer the simplicity of cloud-based tools. For trying out ideas or learning web development, both Z.ai GLM 4.5 and local models let you experiment freely without worrying about racking up costs, so you can focus on creating rather than calculating expenses.
Our Recommendation Strategy
🎯 The Optimal Setup
- • Primary: Claude Sonnet 4.5 model for professional projects
- • Learning: GLM 4.5 for testing and experimentation
- • Premium backup: Claude Opus 4.1 for complex edge cases
💰 Budget-Conscious Approach
- • Start with GLM 4.5 for everything
- • Upgrade to Claude Sonnet 4.5 for important projects
- • Use local models for maximum cost savings
⭐ Premium Quality Approach
- • Claude Sonnet 4.5 model as your primary choice
- • GLM 4.5 for quick prototypes and testing
🔄 Smart Switching Strategies - Example
Build-First Approach:
- • Start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 to build core functions and features
- • Switch to Z.ai GLM 4.5 for small changes, tweaks, and iterations
- • Best for getting solid foundation quickly
Cost-First Approach:
- • Use Z.ai GLM 4.5 for design and feature implementations
- • Switch to Claude Sonnet 4.5 for advanced bug fixing and complex features
- • Perfect when GLM 4.5 can't solve something
The Bottom Line
🎯 Smart Model Selection Strategy
For the best Shakespeare experience, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 for professional projects or the low-cost GLM 4.5 for learning and testing. Both models are specifically optimized for website building within Shakespeare and provide seamless integration.
Alternatively, Z.ai GLM 4.5 offers excellent value for most website building tasks, delivering professional results at a fraction of Claude's cost, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 remains the premium choice when absolute quality is essential.
Remember, Shakespeare is built on user choice and flexibility. If you already have API keys with existing providers that work well for your projects, feel free to continue using them. These recommendations are guidelines, not requirements—the best model is ultimately the one that fits your workflow, budget, and project needs.
Ready to Build with Shakespeare?
Start building amazing projects with AI-powered development on Nostr.
Turn your ideas into reality through natural conversation with AI
Get the latest Shakespeare updates and resources
Stay updated with the latest features and announcements. Optionally provide your npub to link your account.